California Supreme Court refuses to review County of Butte v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court has let stand a landmark appellate court ruling that protects the right of medical marijuana patients and their primary caregivers to collectively cultivate. The ruling by California’s Third Appellate District Court also affirmed a patient’s ability to take civil action when their right to collectively cultivate is violated by law enforcement. The Butte County case involved a private 7-patient medical marijuana collective in Paradise, California.

The ruling was originally tied to a lawsuit filed in May 2006 by Americans for Safe Access (ASA) on behalf of 56-year-old David Williams and six other collective members after Butte County Sheriffs conducted a warrantless search of his home in 2005. Deputies forced Williams to uproot more than two-dozen plants by threatening arrest and prosecution. Contrary to state law, Williams was told by the Sheriff that his collectively cultivated medical marijuana was illegal.

After court Joe Elford, ASA Chief Counsel commented “By refusing to review this case, the California Supreme Court sends a strong message that local law enforcement must uphold the medical marijuana laws of the state and not competing federal laws.” Joe was the attorney that litigated the case on behalf of Williams. The appellate court ruling from July 2009 concluded that, “[T]he deputy was acting under color of California law, not federal law. Accordingly, the propriety of his conduct is measured by California law.”

In its ruling, the appellate court asserted that the Compassionate Use Act of 1996 is not simply an affirmative defense to criminal sanctions: “[W]e see an opportunity for an individual to request the same constitutional guarantee of due process available to all individuals, no matter what their status, under the state Constitution. The fact that this case involves medical marijuana and a qualified medical marijuana patient does not change these fundamental constitutional rights or an individual’s right to assert them.”

Further information and documents:

CA Supreme Court disposition (Case # S175219):
Ruling by California’s Third Appellate District Court:
Information on Butte Case:

RELATED ARTICLE

Written By

admin

administrator

3 thoughts on “California Supreme Court refuses to review County of Butte v. Superior Court

  • Liliana

    I am really loving the theme/design of your
    site. Do you ever run into any internet browser compatibility issues?
    A handful of my blog visitors have complained about my blog not operating correctly in Explorer but looks great in Firefox.
    Do you have any tips to help fix this issue?

  • Jorja

    Greetings I am so thrilled I found your website, I really found you by
    mistake, while I was searching on Google for something else, Anyways I
    am here now and would just like to say kudos for a incredible
    post and a all round interesting blog (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to read it all at the
    minute but I have book-marked it and also included your RSS feeds, so
    when I have time I will be back to read much more, Please
    do keep up the fantastic work.

  • Jens

    This website really has all of the information I needed concerning this
    subject and didn’t know who to ask.

LEAVE A COMMENT

"" was added to wishlist